Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 20,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
But no matter how long its history of appellate adjudication, no matter how experienced its attorneys, nothing can quite prepare a state for three Supreme Court oral arguments in 30 days. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:55 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
The case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
The United States filed an amicus brief in supporter of the Borough. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
This issue came up a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 2:15 am
United States. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am
Supreme Court’s holding nearly two hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
But it's true nevertheless that when prisoners are kept off the street, they can attack only one another, not you or your family.Imprisonment's crime-reduction effect helps explain why the burglary, car-theft, and robbery rates are lower in the United States than in England. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
“We disclaim altogether any jurisdiction in the courts of the United States upon the subject of divorce. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
See State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:17 pm
Cal. 2003); and Mid-States Coalition for Progress v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Cal. 2003); and Mid-States Coalition for Progress v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
Kirtsaeng bought textbooks in Thailand, where they are cheap, brought them to the United States, and resold them at a large profit. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
First, the government’s brief contends, the Supreme Court has long held that when a patent holder sells (or authorizes the sale of) a patented product in the United States, the patent laws do not restrict the subsequent sale of the product. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
United States — the notorious trio of worst Supreme Court decisions....All 3 of those decisions cut against the individual's right. [read post]
