Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2010, 12:12 am
Decision of the BOIP The BOIP ruled that, based on ECJ case law, explanatory notes such as the Joint Statements are not legally binding (ECJ, Antonissen, C-292/89, 26 February 1991). [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:07 am
The case is Eric Victor Burdon v John Steel Case O-369-13 of 9 September, a decision of Katfriend Geoffrey Hobbs QC in his capacity as an Appointed Person. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:08 am
The Board found that the standard character marks are identical to the applied-for mark, but not the design forms of the mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
In another gem of a case that warrants addition to our WYHA? [read post]
29 May 2006, 2:24 am
The Ninth Circuit recently decided a trademark case that, while interesting, involves a fact pattern unlikely to pop up again anytime soon. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
Stark & Stark attorneys, Mark M. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
Strength of the plaintiff's mark: As the court notes, in a more typical trademark case this factor would favor Jenzabar on summary judgment, because the mark is fanciful and (according to Jenzabar) has accrued significant reputational value. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 2:52 pm
He agrees (with Mark!) [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 7:28 am
Here are the rest of today's Community trade mark decisions from Luxembourg ...Case T-190/05 Sherwin-Williams v OHIM (TWIST & POUR). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
Zynga voluntarily dismissed the case against several defendants early on. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
., the owners of Maker's Mark, believes so. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
" Opposer contended that it needed additional discovery under FRCP 56(f), but the Board noted that Applicant had conceded all the du Pont factors except for the dissimilarity in the marks, and further that Opposer had been able to address that issue substantively in its brief.Turning to the substance, the Board likened this case to Kellogg v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:53 pm
The earliest case reported to state authorities occurred on July 20, and the latest case reported occurred on Oct. 10. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:35 am
Thursday marks day 79 of the trial, and Sham has been remanded for more than 700 days since the trial began. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm
Ct. 1744 (2017) (disparaging marks) and Iancu v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
One couple, Mark and Tammy LaRace, moved back into their Cape Cod-style house in Springfield and “put their pictures back on the walls” two years after they were evicted, said Glenn Russell, one of the attorneys who won the case. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:27 am
How does the anchor defendant mechanism operate in the realm of EU trade marks and actions on trade mark infringement? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:16 am
Cooper case. [read post]
