Search for: "Organ v. State" Results 6741 - 6760 of 23,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am by Eric Goldman
It’s increasingly hard to find good news in Internet law, so I organized this year’s Internet Law roundup by categories of doom. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Iancu is likely to prove more immediately impactful to the status quo than the accompanying decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
”   James Mets – The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:07 am
Auth, 550 US 330.** The Appellate Division noted that Diederich had not argued that he has standing under State Finance Law §123-b on appeal and deemed that he had abandoned that claim.*** Ultra vires - Latin for "beyond its powers," referring to an organization or its officers that exceeds the powers granted it by law.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_07850.htmNYPPL [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:35 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s ruling in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:10 am by David Hart QC
Further, the Council is not entitled to base an act adopting restrictive measures on information or evidence in the file communicated by a Member State, if that Member State is not willing to authorise its communication to the courts of the European Union whose task is to review the lawfulness of that decision (see, by analogy, Case T-284/08 People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council [2008] ECR II-3487, paragraph 73). [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Gallo Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Gallo Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:27 am by Cicely Wilson
  Determination of the ownership of the property is likely possible without resolving religious questions.United States v. [read post]