Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 9:09 am
Moore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
And here’s one application of the law, from Thomas v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
Some 8,000 people had to be tested for the disease after her years-long actions were discovered. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
He has found very few people to agree with this view, however, because usually he receives back the mantra "claims have to be construed the same for infringement as for patentability". [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:59 pm
See, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:59 am
Perhaps repeated unwanted direct contacts can rise to the level of harassment, but that doesn’t seem to have occurred here. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:38 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
The new kidnapping offence would be committed where a person, D: without lawful authority or reasonable excuse; intentionally uses force or the threat of force; in order to take another person V, or otherwise cause them to move in his company. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
Here, he has a thoughtful article on Why Innocent People Plead Guilty. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 9:42 pm
Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm
However, regarding the programming issue, the debate of whether or not APIs can be copyrighted is a key issue in the Oracle v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
In Palermo v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:59 pm
I confess that I don’t have a lot of patience for all of the very serious discussion people seem to be having about the case of Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
That the argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
As regards necessity, OHIM’s Analysis itself makes the point, noting that ”The Office’s current name is well-known in the IP community and has acquired a high level of distinction”. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
FMC Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 10:59 pm
Huawei; Invista Sarl v. [read post]
