Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 6741 - 6760 of 55,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
  It concerns, first, a seemingly rather esoteric question of statutory interpretation, namely whether the power under section 4 of the Fisheries Act 1981 to impose a levy in respect of sea fish and sea fish products “landed” in the UK extends to the imposition of a levy in respect of sea fish and sea fish products first brought to land elsewhere and then imported into the UK. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Zinke, in which the justices will consider the separation-of-powers limits on Congress’ ability to direct the outcome of litigation. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Canadian Topsires Selection Inc., 2016 BCSC 1095 https://t.co/8a9uThLg2u -> Big win for Rogers on division of powers grounds Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
These powers are derived from Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights and EU Law. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
IPBiz notes that in Chevron v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
Nonetheless, advocates of using federal constitutional power in an active way sometimes controlled the government and so did change the scope of federal constitutional power – but without using amendments. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Yesterday we looked at a California federal court decision in Martensen v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:04 pm
Liptak writes specifically about Chief Justice Rehnquist and his opinion in a 2003 decision "that so delighted Justice Ginsburg," Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 9:37 am by Derek T. Muller
Some have wondered about whether the Senate might refuse to seat him; I explain in the piece why that is inconsistent with the constitutional understanding set forth in Powell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am by Jon
The power to punish conspiracy cannot be included with the class of incidental or resulting powers. ... the people of the United States, by declaring that treason should consist only in levying war. [read post]