Search for: "S. et al"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 29,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 7:20 am
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP et al., allowed a breach of contract and indemnity claim to move forward despite the fact that conflicting term sheets between the plaintiff and defendant could have been read to violate Virginia law by requiring indemnity for English’s own negligence. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:35 pm
Artspace Everett Lofts Condominium Association et al, 2018 WL 6042312, (W.D. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. et al., No. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:43 pm
Six Flags Entertainment Corp. et al., at least three of the seven justices on the Illinois Supreme Court appeared to be skeptical of claims that private actions under the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) require proof of actual harm to establish standing. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:31 am
Two stories about the work of Justiça nos Trilhos, the first of which includes Vale’s responses: “Confronting asymmetrical power: Empowering Brazil’s rural communities to assert their legal rights & challenge corporate impunity – Interview with Danilo Chammas – lawyer and activist for Justiça nos Trilhos”, Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, Mar 2015. [read post]
RICHARD S. PHILLIPS AND THE PHILLIPS LAW FIRM, P.A. v. DANIEL COX AND COX LAW CENTER, L.L.C., et al.
25 Nov 2018, 5:02 pm
Civil litigation — Discovery failure — Attorney’s fees In this case, the Circuit Court for Talbot County granted appellee Mark Wester’s motion to compel discovery, and entered judgment in the amount of $980.50 in favor of his attorneys, appellees Daniel Cox and the Cox Law Center, LLC (“Cox”), and against Jessica Wester’s attorneys, appellants Richard ... [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 1:09 pm
The case is Boyden et al v Conlin et al. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Fedele, 2018 QCCA 1901Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), Montréal, 500-10-006699-183 et autresDécision de : Juges Marie-France Bich, Robert M. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 7:09 am
A transactional license for two chapters from the print book version of Negotiating a Vacant Lot: Studying the Visual in Canada (2014) by Lynda Jessop et al. for a class of 60 students is $414 CAD, while an unlimited license for the eBook version is $150 USD. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 10:07 am
The service issue was sorted out by the CJEU in Fahnenbrock (Joined Cases C-226/13 et al., ECLI:EU:C:2015:383), already back in 2015. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 10:03 am
Chastain, et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – November 15th, 2018) involves a claim of violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:58 am
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation et al., a case arising under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/1 et seq. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In the Tribunal’s view, the use of the words “for or on behalf of any other person” in subsection 26(5) indicates that Parliament intended to restrict the deemed sale price to custom retreads. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:30 pm
As a result, the President’s executive order will be suspended until a decision is reached by the court in the lawsuit East Bay Sanctuary Covenant et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
., et al., affirmed the district court’s finding that patent claims asserted by Digital Media against Netflix, Amazon and Hulu were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
., et al., affirmed the district court’s finding that patent claims asserted by Digital Media against Netflix, Amazon and Hulu were invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Health et al, T-1071-16 (“Suzuki Foundation”). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:59 am
Judicial: ELHANNON LLC, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:48 am
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman explains why one of the court’s newest cases for OT 2018, In re Department of Commerce, et al., a dispute arising out of a challenge to the administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census, is “a very strange, almost inexplicable, grant. [read post]
