Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 6741 - 6760 of 13,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 6879 (ED CA, Jan. 20, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend claims by an inmate that authorities restricted his ability to practice Shetaut Neter in the prison's Special Housing Unit by preventing a name change and ordering of spiritual items, and by denying communal worship, observance of Neterian holidays and access to a Neterian chaplain.In Gee v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
That means that §602(a)(1) allows the importation into the United States of a copy of a protected work purchased abroad. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm by Gregory B. Williams
Trend Micro Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 14-435-LPS (D.Del., January 16, 2015), the Court granted defendants’ motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (“Northern District”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Because class actions are out of control in California, there are lots more ascertainability cases in Ninth Circuit district courts that we haven't cited. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:33 pm
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015, the United States Supreme Court declined certiorari review of Iskanian v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by @travelblawg
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Banco Para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba or standard rules of agency, and whether a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the act occurring outside of the United States or the sale of the ticket in the United States for travel outside of the country. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
A few days ago I noted a recent California Court of Appeal ruling holding that an Internet posting (on a Facebook page, in that instance) that was accessible in California and caused harm to California residents was not a sufficient basis for finding that the defendant was subject to the personal jurisdiction of the California courts. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:28 am
  Depending on certain particulars, homeopathic drugs must also be recognized by and comply with requirements of the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States, the United States Pharmacopeia, or the National Formulary. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:28 am by Lisa Baird
The Writ seeks reversal of the Ninth Circuit’s decision, PhRMA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
 The United States Supreme Court held that jurisdiction over the reporter and the editor in California was proper “based on the ‘effects’ of their Florida conduct in California. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]