Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 6741 - 6760
of 10,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
Comm'n v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:36 am
Judge Posner, writing for the court, stated, “[i]f (c) appeared after all the prohibitions, which is to say after (d) and (e) as well as (b), the natural inference would be that any violator of any of the prohibitions could be sued for damages. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm
Reilly v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
§ 34-12-101 et seq.; and e. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:09 am
§ 706(1)) and FDC Act § 512(e)(1), which states (similar to its NDA counterpart at FDC Act § 505(e)(1)) in relevant part that FDA: shall, after due notice and opportunity for hearing to the applicant, issue an order withdrawing approval of an application filed pursuant to [FDC Act § 512(b)] with respect to any new animal drug if the Secretary finds . . . . [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
United States, 547 U. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
“The Old” (2009; but often overlooked Section 317.114 of the Ohio Revised Code) sets forth the following requirements for recorded real estate documents:A) Computer font size of at least ten point (except Notary stamps, seals and signatures); B) Maximum paper size: 8 ½ x 14; Minimum paper size: 8 ½ x 11;C) Margins of 1 inch on each side of the page and on bottom;D) 3 inch margin on the top of the first page, reserved for recorder, auditor and engineer;1 ½… [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
KALTENBACHER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
The Supreme Court has made clear in Community Communications Co., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
TITLE V–GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 501. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:38 am
Rule 4:23-2(b) provides: (b) . . . [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
Code § 1030(c)(2)(B)(ii), which states that the punishment for an offense under 18 U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Authored by Peter B. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
” Timothy B. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
B. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:51 am
The Supreme Court handed down its unanimous decision in the case of Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
