Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 23,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2012, 10:30 pm
S.M.K. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:31 am
To understand the charges, and the opinion this post examines, it is helpful to understand a little about what was going on in the case. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
The court in Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
The dissent also rips into the majority’s work-for-hire analysis, noting that the key element is the degree of control exercised by the putative employee, and here it was undisputed that Garcia exercised little or no control over the production. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
See, e.g., Tramm v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
Anthony V. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
To that end, I need to provide an accessible explanation of the importance of U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Rory Little previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
Labrador v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Citing Massaro v New York State Thruway Authority, 111 AD3d at 1003, the court said "An unwarranted invasion of personal privacy has been characterized as that which would be offensive and objectionable to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities" Here DCS "particularly and specifically justified its denial" when it stated that the correlation of names and home zip codes invaded employee privacy, and offered to release a summary or de-identified… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am
With more than 30 amicus briefs filed in the Microsoft Ireland case – including from members of Congress, the European Commission, the Chamber of Commerce, privacy advocates and dozens of media organizations – United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Company – Chevron v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
In Microsoft v AT&T, in 2007, the justices clarified how the statute applies when software is transmitted from the United States but copied overseas. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
At that point Earnest filed a postconviction challenge in state court (represented by Tom Sullivan, now at Arkansas-Little Rock). [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The analysis of key cases in these four areas indicates that, where Congress has included a savings clause in the allegedly preemptive federal statute, the Rehnquist Court was willing to allow some redress to injured persons, yet at the same time it paid little attention to savings clauses when it came to the preemption of protective state or local regulations. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
Wynne; he observes that the Justices “appeared to have little sympathy . . . for a Maryland tax that has the effect of ‘double-taxing’ residents for income they make outside the state. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:22 am
In today’s case (McCarthy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:54 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:41 am
Compare Empagran S.A. v. [read post]
