Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 6741 - 6760 of 19,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  So now, as our learned intermediary headcount post describes in detail, there is precedent following the learned intermediary rule in every state in the country – ranging from high court or statutory authority in 38 states (and DC), to a Vermont state trial court at the other extreme.Plainly, reports of the death of the learned intermediary rule have, in the words of Mark Twain, have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm by Record on Appeal
Op. at p. 3 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
As part of an ACSblog symposium marking the fiftieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Griswold v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
, (IMPACT), (IPR-Helpdesk), (I/PUpdates), New OHIM guidelines on opposition, cancellation and international marks: (CATCH US IF YOU CAN!!!) [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
U.S. here, here] “From Chevron to ‘Consent of the Governed'” [David Schoenbrod, Cato Regulation magazine; Cato panel discussion video with Adam White, David Doniger, Shapiro and Yeatman; Federalist Society panel discussion video with Mark Chenoweth, Doniger, Kristin Hickman, Schoenbrod, Jennifer Mascott] “Recognizing the Congressional Review Act’s Full Potential” [Jonathan Wood, Federalist Society, earlier] “Idaho is the only state… [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 6:01 am by Amy Howe
In the wake of last summer’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
I would like to thank Mark Tushnet for his thoughtful reply to my article. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Singh considers two cases, Bayer v Natco and Novartis AG v Union of India, to see how compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals and evergreening of patents are dealt with by the Indian judiciary.Part VII “Lores of IP during wartime”Arpan Banerjee and Dana Beldiman, in Chapter 14, “International Trade Mark Enforcement Under the Versailles Treaty: A Case Study of Sanatogen”, discuss how the Bombay High Court applied IP-related provisions of the… [read post]