Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 8,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 3:49 am
Virginia State Board of Elections, in which the court upheld one of 12 Virginia electoral districts against a racial gerrymandering challenge and sent the remaining 11 back to the district court to reconsider whether race was the predominant factor in drawing the district lines, arguing that the decision “is a home run for voters,” because the court refused to let Virginia “make it harder for voters to bring racial gerrymandering claims, by allowing a… [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am
Additional Resources: Fried v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 8:14 am
See Cassista v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:20 am
” (See Snyder v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
But unless you can get a class action certified — tricky, but possible, like in Dukes v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:13 pm
But two years later, the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Lost Property, Mislaid Property, and Treasure Trove The State of Texas v. $281,420.00 in United States Currency, No. 08? [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 5:05 am
” Wolston v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:45 am
In the 2011 case NASA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:19 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
The critical decision was, I think, Davis. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 4:16 am
Clarke, which asks whether tribal sovereignty bars a lawsuit in state court against a limousine driver who rear-ended the plaintiffs while driving his passengers home from a tribe-owned casino, and Czyzewski v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:11 am
Similarly, the New York seminal case is Mauro v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
Most important however was his stand on Brown v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over claims that: 1) a police officer's decision to run a warrant check on him was based on his race, in violation of his Equal Protection rights; 2) the search of his vehicle incident to his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment; and 3) questioning by the police after his arrest violated his Fifth Amendment rights under Miranda. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:57 am
See Bolden v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
Inexplicably, tragedies like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921 don't count. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Perhaps the best-known application of this thesis involves the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
"] From B.B. v. [read post]
