Search for: "US Constitution Petition"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 12,706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 2:40 am
Constitution (drafted in 1787), and its principles are reflected in the Bill of Rights (adopted in 1791). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:04 am
According to the transcript of the Aug.18, 2010, governing board meeting, Klein declared, “(We will) never convince the people that are adamant against us. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Seven justices agreed the cross is constitutional. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
The plaintiffs filed a verified petition for a writ of mandate on July 22, 2004, almost four months after the 35-day statute of limitations triggered by the NOE had expired. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
However, the court concluded that the free speech areas constituted designated public forums for First Amendment purposes. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
For example, possession of marijuana for recreational or medical purposes or employment in the marijuana industry may constitute conduct that violates federal controlled substance laws. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
But it is likely DOJ will at least advert to its longstanding view that even Congress as a whole does not have Article III standing to defend the constitutionality of statutes or to compel executive enforcement of the law, using two basic and related arguments. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
Schriro, 08-7229, three years after denial of cert., the Justices denied relief without comment, reminding us that grants of rehearing remain very much the exception to the rule. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:15 pm
Justice Bucaria’s decision contains a useful summary of the applicable law: The legislative purpose in rendering a § 1118 election irrevocable is to prevent the majority shareholder from making an election, prolonging negotiations as to fair value, and then revoking the election, thus delaying the dissolution proceeding and exhausting the petitioning shareholder’s resources. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
“As used in this Section, “pleadings” includes any petition or motion filed in the dissolution of marriage case which, if independently filed, would constitute a separate cause of action, including, but not limited to, actions for declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and orders of protection. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
Jimenez then filed a pro-se cert. petition, which the Court granted (a quite rare occurrence). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
” Seeking to head off the government’s claim that Arizona was trying to use powers that belong solely to federal officials, the Arizona petition contended that the state, in enacting S.B. 1070, “was acutely aware of he need to respect federal authority over immigration-related matters. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:10 am
The Snepp opinion doesn’t discuss the constitutional presumption that prior restraints are unenforceable. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
A substantive due process issue that the US Supreme Court found unnecessary to address in its decision last year will likely be the subject of the Philip Morris petition. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:47 am
It matters how easy to use and accessible the portal will be. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
 The two sides directly involved take diametrically opposing views of what the evidence used, or not used, at the trial means. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:31 am
This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
After analyzing the above-listed cases, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that this case was different and that M&B’s statements made in the advertising materials constituted commercial speech because they: (1) arose out of the sale of M&B’s legal services, and (2) were intended for M&B’s potential customers – people who had used Kool Smiles’ services and who wanted to file a lawsuit against them. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Specifically, petitioners could not use CEQA to seek injunctive relief to directly enjoin Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co., the private freight operator, from conducting its freight operations because this “would not involve simply the state’s autonomy and control over its subdivisions, but would constitute use of state law to restrict operations by a private rail carrier – a classic example of state regulation. [read post]
