Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 6741 - 6760 of 8,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform  Act – Senate patent reform debate (Maier & Maier) (IPBiz) (Inventive Step) (Maryland IP Law Blog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patents Post Grant Blog) Patent reform – first-to-invent vs first-to-file debate (Patentology) (Inventive Step) (IPBiz) (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) Patent Reform: Good for Innovation. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hill reports that President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing CNN for defamation over articles about Russian efforts to assist the Presidents 2016 presidential bid. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:56 am by Justin Cole
  Executive branch officials have stated that the United States not only welcomes but “is supporting” the ICC Prosecutor’s investigation in Ukraine. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court and the majority of jurisdictions in the United States allow defensive use of nonmutual estoppel. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:34 pm
Consider NMCCA's fairly recent decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:57 am by Steve Hall
The legal compact demanded by the United States Supreme Court when it reinstituted capital punishment as a sentencing option in 1976 has been broken, repeatedly, not by convicts, but by hundreds of overzealous administrators of the nation's justice systems. [read post]