Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 66,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
Because, well, he'd like to like in the same country as his spouse, please. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Ryll v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:26 pm
The ABA Journal reports of the US Supreme Court case of Turner v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
Perhaps moving to what some other states (and the federal system) have done: just make the whole thing discretionary.I've always thought that the most powerful way of making an argument -- as well as the most difficult -- is to advance a position in a way that makes the recipient (whether a judge, jury, or whomever) believe that s/he's come up with the right answer on their own. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Fortunately, the trial court and the Appellate Division seem to understand both the equities as well as the law. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:31 am
Well, well, well. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the complete text of Hamilton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
So far therefore all going well for JAI. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:40 am
SG-17 by Pilgrim State Hospital. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
UNITED STATES In Padilla v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:12 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:44 pm
Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 6:43 am
Judge Seyla is well known for his linguistic talents. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Noting that ECHR rights had been incorporated into domestic law, the House of Lords decided that the law breached Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention, even though they took the view that the matter might well be held by Strasbourg to be within the margin of appreciation of member States. [read post]
