Search for: "B. R." Results 6761 - 6780 of 53,081
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2019, 8:34 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  The legal setting is unusual because (a) the Legislature mandated the preparation of the EIR and (b) the Department did not approve any project. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm by Michèle Giguère
Boulet annonçait les couleurs de la réforme qu’il souhaite mener afin de moderniser les lois québécoises en matière de santé et de sécurité au travail. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:46 pm by Associated Press
Kelly held in a Chicago jail without bond on sex-related charges, saying that the R&B singer had failed to convince the court that he would not commit new crimes if released. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 11:23 am by Astarita
 The defendants agreed to settle the matter by, among other things, cumulatively agreeing to over $60 million in disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties.The SEC's complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, charges AR Capital and Block with violating the anti-fraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder, and falsifying books and records of ARCP. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Harm) § 47(b) & cmt. f & ill. 3 indicates: An actor whose negligent conduct causes serious emotional harm to another is subject to liability to the other if the conduct … occurs in the course of specified categories of activities, undertakings, or relationships in which negligent conduct is especially likely to cause serious emotional harm…. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:10 am by Tracy Thomas
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/B-KaiYmqtiM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan
-Va.) and Michael Waltz (R. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The court noted that, absent any applicable exception to the general rule, the failure to comply with the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b), pertaining to the requirement to file Concise Statement of Errors on Appeal when ordered to do so by the court also resulted in an automatic waiver of all issues on appeal. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:26 am by Sara Parrello
The PRV thus appealed before the Svea Court of Appeal, (Stockholm), which decided to stay the proceedings to ask the CJEU if Art 4(1)(b) of the EU Directive precludes national provisions to permit disclaimers whose effect would be to exclude an element of a complex trademark from the assessment of likelihood of confusion or to attribute to such an element, in advance and permanently, limited importance in that analysis. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In doing so, it creates better policy outcomes than the strictly conservative approach that ignores the profound impact that technology can have on the law, and its effectiveness, The liberal approach employed by courts and policy makers is categorized for organizational purposes into the following discrete but related enquiries where legal analysis: (a) explores the complex interplay between law and technology; (b) recognizes that the law should respond directly to technology developments… [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm by Tobias Lutzi
As a consequence, Art 7(1)(b) Brussels Ia allocates jurisdiction to the place of performance of the allegedly defrauded contract, being Villach since Reitbauer and others delivered their renovation services in that location (see Case C-337/17 Feniks, [46]). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 8:18 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
Por el contrario, la Ley del 23 de octubre de 1888, se basó en el “sistema de la pena mínima” Sin embargo a nivel internacional, las negociaciones se siguieron dando bajo el sistema de listado de delitos como lo es el caso del Tratado de Extradición con Bolivia, suscrito apenas dos años antes (en la ciudad de La Paz el día 16 de abril de 1886)En general esa fue la tendencia si nos remitimos a los Tratados de Extradición bilaterales negociados en… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:05 pm by Astarita
" The SEC has charged Lawler and Bannister with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and the registration provisions of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act; and, as to Lawler, market manipulation provision of Section 9(a) of the Exchange Act.The SEC's investigation has been conducted by Hane L. [read post]