Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 8,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Paragraph 5(a)(ii): Any person in Canada and any Canadian outside Canada is prohibited from providing or acquiring financial services or any other services to, from or for the benefit or on the direction or order of any person in Iran for the purposes establishing a branch, subsidiary or representative office or an Iranian financial institution in Canada or a Canadian financial institution in Iran; 14. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
LEXIS 75956; Nicholson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:30 pm
On June 21, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Holder v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:04 pm
See State of North Carolina v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
” Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:34 am
Of course, the starting point for many con law classes is Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:18 am
Supreme Court in Vermont v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:10 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:17 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
The ADA requires that individuals with disabilities be provided services in the most integrated setting appropriate, as determined by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
State Department, which appeared in the Department's Bulletin:For the first time in history, restitution may be expected to continue for as long as works of art known to have been plundered during a war continue to be rediscovered.The executive branch has not deviated from this position to date. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
The Court of Appeals, New York State's top court has ruled on the issue, affirming a lower court that "it is established that no liability attaches to a landowner whose tree falls outside of his premises and injures another unless there exists actual or constructive knowledge of the defective condition of the tree" Ivancic v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
” Plaintiff Adam Gustafson and his wife… proceed pro se against various state officials. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
In a court case, "the government" always refers to one party on one side of the v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:04 am
In the most recent Nazi-looted art appeal of Grosz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Field v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
City of Farmers Branch, 496 F.Supp.2d 757 (N.D.Tex., 2007).Perhaps the best summary, however, comes from another Brennan opinion not long after De Canas dealing with state laws that piggyback on Federal immigration laws, Plyler v. [read post]
