Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
The decision issued after a bench trial in Garvey v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:27 am
And right to publish it so it's clearly the law in California. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
the Court’s moderates and liberals, is to say that California’s state law practice of saying that proponents of a ballot initiative have standing to sue to vindicate it does not cut any ice in federal court. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 12:09 pm
Fortunately, in 1996, in the landmark case of People v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
The question of the enforceability of the FFP was, however, a question of California law. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
The complaint merely alleges 7-Eleven "has violated both California law and/or its own contractual promise, thereby depriving the class members of money earned by them. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 6:40 pm
A California Appellate Court supported a trial court's ruling that the Medical Device Amendments (MDA), Title 21 USC §360k(a), preempts any state law imposing safety requirements on manufacturers of a medical device. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
In Alvarado v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:45 am
California still follows that oldie but not-so-goodie, Frye v . [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
The story covers oral argument in Minneci v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
California law applies. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
” Haro v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
A suit under the anonymous posting was brought forwards for libel and for violating California law regarding online impersonation. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
Sometimes, when we blog these technology cases, we act as if the law in California is the law everywhere. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:31 am
In a recent court case, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:36 am
The California Supreme Court decided today in People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:28 pm
Ni v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
Choice of Law and Stromberg v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
Lu v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
McCoy said, "we chose to bring this lawsuit in State Court rather than in Federal Court because sexual orientation is a protected class under California State Law and it is not recognized in Federal Law. [read post]
