Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 31,295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2019, 5:13 pm
Since relocation almost invariably relates to the best interests of the minor child, the parent seeking to relocate and the non-relocating parent should also consider and present evidence to the court how the relocation will affect the best interests of the child as set forth in Pettinato to the extent that the Dupre relocation factors do not already address those best interests. [1] Pettinato v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
In the matter of D (a child), heard 3-4 Oct 2018. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
The complaint (full text) in Maddonna v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 5:31 pm
A good illustration of a situation where a court refuses to modify a New York child support agreement is in the case, D.C. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 4:18 pm
In Weaver v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:38 am
Alimony Awards Can be Changed The court delivered its written opinion in Finstad v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:50 am
Case citation: Rassamni v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:23 pm
Today the Supreme Court of Canada issued a very important privacy decision in R v Jarvis. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:23 pm
Today the Supreme Court of Canada issued a very important privacy decision in R v Jarvis. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 1:09 pm
Child custody order not set aside for falsified evidence after one year affirmed by Ky Court of Appeals in published opinion Diana Skaggs Thu, 02/14/2019 - 16:09 Read more about Child custody order not set aside for falsified evidence after one year affirmed by Ky Court of Appeals in published opinion Carroll v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:38 pm
Citing Hamby v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:38 pm
Citing Hamby v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:36 am
Legal malpractice in child custody / child support settings is notoriously difficult to prove. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The interest in avoiding having a child is one that everyone (including men) ought to have before conception and that women ought to have until the point at which there already is a child whose location happens to be inside the mother’s womb. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:05 pm
Giboney v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Richardson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:29 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000Read More [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Rachins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
In the matter of D (a child), heard 3-4 Oct 2018. [read post]
