Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 6761 - 6780 of 13,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
On Friday, the Supreme Court granted review in the twice-relisted Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
")  Recently, in a case decided by the United States Court of Federal Claims, Superior Helicopter LLC and Ranier Heli-Lift, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
 PatentsKeep up to speed with Chinese telecom litigation: Shenzhen court issues written judgment in Huawei v Samsung case. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
When questioned by the court, Moon explained that the original invoice was in her office and the exhibit offered at trial was a duplicate made from the original invoice. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court in Cloutier v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:10 pm by Charles Miller
In the AFL-CIO v Chertoff litigation concerning the DHS rulemaking, the District Court in the Northern District of California had issued a preliminary injunction to stay the effect of the DHS no-match safe-harbor final rule. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:15 am by David Lynn
As a person who got his start at the SEC by working as a law clerk in the SEC’s Office of Administrative Law Judges, I got a front row seat to see how the SEC’s administrative proceedings work. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Administrative Law MattersStandard of Review of Regulations: Auer v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Aaron Tang
Jones, in individual cases, could at most have only the modest impact that officers will have to go through the administrative hassle of applying for easily-obtained warrants. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
  By contrast, the Court noted, allowing state attorneys general to enforce state laws in court (but not exercise visitorial powers) "would preserve a regime of exclusive administrative oversight by the Comptroller while honoring in fact rather than merely in theory Congress's decision not to pre-empt substantive state law. [read post]