Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 16,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
The burden on COM’s cross motion shifted to the Sadiku’s, requiring them to submit evidence showing that there is an issue of fact which must be tried (see Alvarez v Prospect Hospital, supra). [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
It would be interesting to see if the plaintiff appeals this decision before the Supreme Court of India. *********** [1] Tea Board, India v ITC Limited, (C.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
State; And Judge Miller in George v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: Oliver v. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am
“ Kubisz v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court today resolved United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:53 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
In 1997, Mr Paulic applied to exercise the Croatian version of the Right to Buy and the Croatian state cross-applied for possession of the flat. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:03 am
Harjo v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:35 am
A post yesterday described this new redistricting dispute (Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 11:21 am
[v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:23 pm
The cross-appeal was therefore dismissed. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:01 am
Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28 (35475) Representativeness focuses on the process used to compile the jury roll, not its ultimate composition, and the state satisfies the right to a representative jury by providing a fair opportunity to participate in the jury process; and that happens where the state makes reasonable efforts to: (1) compile the roll using random selection from lists drawing from a broad cross-section (2) deliver jury notices to those who have been randomly… [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Gerson Alvarenga-Flores was apprehended crossing the U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:10 pm
On July 30, 2009, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled against convicted peace protestors in Tataz, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:00 am
Sampley v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:30 am
In light of last week’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
