Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 8,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
They were some of the same arguments resoundingly rejected by a number of courts examining the various justifications for the same-sex marriage prohibitions — most notably the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts and California Federal District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:02 am
Although it worked at the trial level, the appellate court objected calling UAL’s Motion for Summary Judgment “the most oppressive motion ever presented to a superior court. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
A California federal court said so in Laster v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
In most instances, however, the Court does appear to view it as a mitigating option that has good potential to reduce some of the harm of geographical separation between a parent and children.Nonetheless, the law regarding child mobility continues to be governed by the "best interests test" set out by the pre-Skype Supreme Court of Canada, in its 1996 ruling in Gordon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:31 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles, 113 P.2d 1100 (Cal. 2005), or arbitration cases, America Online v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Scoresby appealed that ruling, arguing to the court of appeals, as he does in this Court, that the expert report amounted to no report at all, requiring dismissal. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
Superior Court (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 253, 263.) [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Riddell, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Okay, that was sarcastic, but come on… how ridiculous does this crap have to get before someone says that’s enough? [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:01 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
Difficulties began when the House of Bishops took up the one Constitutional amendment which had passed at General Convention 1889, namely, an amendment to Article V which would allow General Convention to accept from any diocese a cession of some of its territory, to become a missionary diocese. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Ct., 36 Cal.4th 148, 162-63 (2005). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 182 Cal.App.4th 622 (2010), and no other authority. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:58 am
Last Friday, the Texas Supreme Court answered that question in Severance v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:46 am
CML V, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:25 pm
Jacobs who did not participate in the hearing; Superior Court Judge William L. [read post]
