Search for: "E.G. International"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 13,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State University, —The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards Carmen G. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
In particular, the Guide clarifies the following points about the OHSA’s workplace harassment provisions: The suggested content of a workplace harassment policy, which is not otherwise set out in the OHSA; Examples of “reasonable action” that do not constitute workplace harassment under the OHSA; That employers can combine their workplace harassment policies and programs into one document or combine both documents with other workplace policies of the employer (e.g.… [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 3:10 am
Cartier International A.G. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:59 am
Here's the call: CALL FOR PAPERSItalian Yearbook of International Law, Volume XXVI (2016)International Law in Regional and Domestic Legal SystemsVolume XXVI (2016) of the Italian Yearbook of International Law (IYIL) will include a Focus on “International Law in Regional and Domestic Legal Systems”, which will be edited in cooperation with the Interest Group on “International Law in Domestic Legal Orders” of the Italian Society… [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
O'Donnell then makes a comment which might be read as implying that Trump wouldn't have been subject to the payroll tax on anything else from the NYT leak (e.g., Schedule C income), which I did not mean to suggest but couldn't address in the hurly-burly of things.And, not a moment too soon, it's back to regular day life (teaching an International Tax class, working on the E.M. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
The “systems integrity” of such large and complex ERMSs as is Rogers system, requires in fact if not in law, certification of compliance with established, authoritative standards such as the National Standards of Canada for ERMSs or with those of the International Organization for Standardization (the ISO). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:56 pm
See, e.g., Darling v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:52 am
The third is making particular selection or in-play decisions (e.g. substitutions) so as to trigger extra fees or bonuses for agents, or other clubs. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:39 am
The international community would almost certainly see straight baselines around the Spratly Islands as illegitimate under UNCLOS. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:44 am
Shaw, 300 U.S. 245 (1937). [4] See, e.g., Vargas-Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:44 am
Shaw, 300 U.S. 245 (1937). [4] See, e.g., Vargas-Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See, e.g., Golden v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:40 pm
They are important not just as a matter of international norm making--but also for their legal effects within and beyond states (e.g., here). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
Throughout this process, companies would be well-advised to seek guidance from internal or external resources with anti-bribery and anti-corruption compliance expertise to ensure the process is properly calibrated to identify red flags indicating potential payment irregularities, internal control weaknesses or other indicia of possible corruption. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:24 am
It permits a judge to disregard a statute that cannot otherwise be interpreted as producing an unbearably unjust result or deliberately disregards human equality before the law (see e.g., here). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:16 am
It permits a judge to disregard a statute that cannot otherwise be interpreted as producing an unbearably unjust result or deliberately disregards human equality before the law (see e.g., here). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:16 am
See, e.g. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
"Fancy-pants international legal stuff from the Ninth Circuit to begin the week. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:11 am
Dorf offers a differing opinion in this week’s Verdict, arguing that there are both long-term jurisprudence constants (e.g., trends in First Amendment law) and large unknowns, such as how the Court will respond to developing technology. [read post]
