Search for: "GEORGE v. STATE" Results 6761 - 6780 of 7,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
While an earlier version of the case was pending before the Supreme Court in 2005, President Bush issued a memorandum stating he would meet the treaty obligations by “having state courts give effect” to the World Court ruling.But the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the command, ruling that the state’s limits on successive habeas applications took precedence.As the case Medellin v Texas made its way back to the high court last… [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:37 am
Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
And from the text:[V]irtue jurisprudence undermines Fletcher's claim that law must elevate the political above the moral. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ngyuen, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 585 (18 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mayor of London v London Borough of Enfield [2008] EWCA Civ 202 (18 March 2008) LG (Italy) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 190 (18 March 2008) S v Floyd [2008] EWCA Civ 201 (18 March 2008) Housden & Anor v The Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons [2008] EWCA Civ 200 (18 March 2008) Shah… [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:39 pm
Update IV: AFP writes: "China's crackdown on Tibetan protests has dealt a major embarrassment to US President George W. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Again, history is brought to bear to support the conclusions stated in the two sides’ conflicting briefs. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Now, in the clearly pro-business 7 years since George Bush appointed the members of this critical governmental body, the administration states that lawsuits conflict with the agency's ability to do its job, and several justices of the Supreme Court apparently agree. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:28 am
Supreme Court oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
On Tuesday the First Department was confronted by these issues in People v Corliss, 2008 NY Slip Op 01869, which involved a prosecution for an attempted parachute jump off the Empire State Building. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(2) During arguments, Justice Carlos Moreno had an interesting exchange that had echoes of Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:32 am
To celebrate, here's another batch of legal news: Louisiana insurance market recovering, state-run insurer has less risk - Portland attorney David Rossmiller at Dunn Carney in the firm's Insurance Coverage Law Blog DOJ to Pew Report: you forgot to count the children - Texas lawyer Jamie Spencer in his Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog Update: Technology Patents LLC v. [read post]