Search for: "GRANT v. STATE"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 61,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 3:14 pm
Eastus v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:43 pm
In Mossing v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
In AJ v JJ & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1448 the court was required to deal with the situation where the children wished to have their views heard in an abduction case.Lord Justice ThorpeThe Facts: As Lord Justice Thorpe said giving the leading judgment, on the face of it this was a paradigm case for a return order. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Betty Dukes The United States Supreme Court decision in Dukes v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:37 am
Malone v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:35 am
Dist. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:22 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
V. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
On 6 September 2024 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Parish v Wikimedia Foundation [2024] EWHC 2301 (KB) [doc] setting aside an order granting the claimant permission to serve the defendant out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The district court granted fees, as it had discretion to do. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
The complaint does not state a claim cognizable within the jurisdictional grant of the Alien Tort Statute. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 3:48 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
Moore (2011), the Supreme Court, as it often does, reversed a Ninth Circuit grant of habeas petition from a state prisoner. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Or should the Court grant review in Arizona v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional based on… [read post]
