Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 58,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2022, 8:53 am
Croydon London Borough Council was her landlord (“Croydon“). [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm
The problem with this, the petitioner argues, is that diversity is already considered and adjusted for via the state’s unique Top 10 Percent Law, and therefore the race-conscious admissions violate her right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:50 am
Judging from her partial dissent in yesterday’s decision in State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:06 am
We have all seen what she did to the Golden State… California should actually launch a defamation suit against Lindsay for marring their reputation. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
DOITT v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
The Court of Human Rights so decided on 19 January 2017 in Kapsis and Danikas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:26 am
In Kim v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 6:13 am
United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:13 am
Lady Arden provided four particular factors which led her to this conclusion: The common law does not demonstrate any cogent reason for not applying the civil standard. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Judge Seeherman's position on Section 2(e)(4) remains consistent with her concurrence in In re Joint-Stock Company "Baik", 84 USPQ2d 1921, 1924 (TTAB 2007), in stating that the purpose behind Section 2(e)(4) is to keep surnames available to those who wish to use their own names. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:21 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
Thomasson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that Wyner was not a prevailing party because her initial victory was “ephemeral" and the final decision on the merits ultimately went against her.In other words, her claim to fees was totally denuded.For a copy of the United States Supreme Court's decision in this case, please use this link: Sole v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
The question newly added in the petition is a sequel to the Court’s ruling two years ago in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Levine V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:36 am
Department of Justice in United States v. [read post]
