Search for: "I v. B"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2012, 12:55 pm
Reza a bíblia que Noé gritou, tirou a roupa e desmaiou. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
§ 112 because although each element of the claims had support in the specification, the configurations or combinations claimed had no support; examiner based the rejection on the procedure outlined in MPEP § 2163.06(I)(B); the applicant responded only to the adequacy of the examiner's prima facie case and not the substance of the rejection; the MPEP "does not have the force of law," but it "is made available to the public and . . .… [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
According to Laws LJ: “[to] be or purport to be a notice of appeal, the document must (a) identify the appellant, (b) identify the decision against which he seeks to appeal and (c) pace Ouseley J in Kaminksi v Judicial Authority of Poland [2010] EWHC 2772, set out at least the gist of the basis on which the appeal is sought to be presented … So much is, I think, inherent in any sensible understanding of a notice of appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
In Irizarry v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:40 pm
In Jennings v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:14 pm
Recently, I came across a case, H.M. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:43 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:33 am
v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:23 am
Specifically, in People v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 8:34 am
__,§ 3(b). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
Many happy thoughts and feelings collided in my mind and heart as I read the June 23, 2023 decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
I cannot resist the temptation to quote a few paragraphs for reasons of pure and unfettered geekiness:24. [...] [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
I cannot resist the temptation to quote a few paragraphs for reasons of pure and unfettered geekiness:24. [...] [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:40 am
By Eric Goldman As I've said repeatedly, I try to stay away from blogging Internet personal jurisdiction cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:39 am
Texas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:52 am
" [The case is 8:25-cv-00201-DLB, Casa Inc. et al v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
J.A.M. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
I would add that Part B is exceptionally difficult for franchisors to meet. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 2:12 pm
I am assured that stout housing lawyers quail at the prospect. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Kurt Barnes, the Church's Treasurer, to (a) decide how much he can borrow on behalf of the DFMS (the Church's corporate arm), up to $60 million; and (b) how much of that amount he can finance with a mortgage on the building at 815, and how much additional the DFMS can put up in unrestricted trust funds.Is it any wonder, then, that Mr. [read post]
