Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 7,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
Now, roughly a century later, they’re tilting right. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
The decision came in the case of Rep. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
According to Strategypage:The rebellion against the Kadaffi dictatorship in Libya has not produced any official outside help, but Egypt has apparently sent some of its commandos in to help out the largely amateur rebel force. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
It's a decisive step in obtaining a permanent green card. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:52 pm
Res. 1614, by Rep. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
” The Castle Rock case merely re-stated common law and the role of municipal corporations and public safety, etc. [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:39 am
There are also other structures that may be considered eligible beyond a typical ocean front home such as public roads, utilities, bridges, hospitals and other similar public facilities. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
I believe that there are cases in which the principle is intelligible and yet the significance of the delegated decision is simply too great for the decision to be called anything other than “legislative. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:45 pm
It ought to make for required reading among national public officials as well. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am
Joni and Becky claimed that Rasawehr’s posts accused them of killing their husbands and working with county officials to cover this up. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
McLaughlin, given her prominence in their marketing decisions. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm
" … The Department of Justice's prior practice in dealing with members of the media informs this Court's decision. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
After that, you’ll temporarily have to go elsewhere if you’re looking for an endless series of disappointments. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In a strict sense, these questions will only be answered if and when Canadian law societies issue specific guidance or bring public disciplinary proceedings against lawyers for alleged breaches of the duty of technological competence. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
Supreme Court noted that while it had approved the general concept of implied-consent laws, “[t]here must be a limit to the consequences to which motorists may be deemed to have consent by virtue of a decision to drive on public roads. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
We feel that these decisions require re-consideration and hence we direct that this matter be placed before a larger Bench to reconsider the correctness of the aforesaid three decisions. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Either process is actually called “preclearance,” because a state or local government covered by Section 5 is not supposed to put any election change into actual effect without that official seal of approval. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Schultz testified that Spanier approved the decision to ban Sandusky from bringing children into the football locker room and the decision to advise The Second Mile of the 2002 incident. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910), the Court held that the "cruel and unusual punishments" clause "is not fastened to the obsolete, but may acquire meaning as public opinion becomes enlightened by a humane justice. [read post]
