Search for: "In re Faith S."
Results 6761 - 6780
of 11,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2012, 4:03 am
Aug. 25, 2011) (plaintiffs had a right to take a voluntary dismissal of medical malpractice case which failed to include a filing of a certificate of good faith and to re-file case with certificate of good faith). [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 10:09 pm
So, unless the insurer commits bad faith, a consortium claim brought as part of an injury claim that is already worth “policy limits” doesn’t add any real value. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Aug. 8, 2012) (case dismissed for failure to give pre-suit notice and file a certificate of good faith; plaintiff’s argument that the claims were not medical malpractice claims rejected; request to amend complaint denied). [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
" The case was re-filed, naming as plaintiffs a subset of patients whose identities had been actually stolen since the laptop theft, alleging negligence by AvMed in protecting the sensitive information, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
Here's more in the continuing "Year in Review" series. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In this regard, the Panelist believes that although the Respondent can use the “Waterlefe” trademark with reference to property offered for sale on his or his business partner’s website, it is not legitimate to use a domain name that fully incorporates the Complainant’s registered trademarks to re-direct Internet users to such a website. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Here's more in the continuing "Year in Review" series, catching up on more of my backlog of twitter posts of case developments in the past 12 months. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
(In re Brunner), 46 B.R. 752 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 am
We're not deceived by their pretenses to piety. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:38 am
Of course they're prejudicial, which is why they're in evidence, but that can't be blamed on the press.Worse still, the ruling belies the emptiness of one of our beloved legal fictions, that the judge's instructions to the jury not to read about the case or discuss it outside the courtroom matters. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:30 am
Instead, to be on the safe side of modern constitutional doctrine, which had changed dramatically since Congress had last re-visited Section 5 in 1982, I urged Congress to assess where voting problems were occurring today and tailor Section 5 accordingly. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:03 am
Now that we are in the political window, we’re doing a series on the basics of the FCC’s political broadcasting rules. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:35 pm
But here we’re not talking about peer-to-peer relationship trust, which might develop within a commercial network like Alibaba, but faith in the intellectual property enforcement system. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:41 pm
The last thing I wish to do is be offensive to my faith and the faithful. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm
Rmail acknowledges that this argument is for the good faith extension or modification of existing caselaw. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
Lastowka: Grand Theft Auto case rejects NFU, then goes to Rogers because they’re not the same mark. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
They’re talking about things they care about and wish they could protect—so what is law? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
If there is no escrow account established and the parties have decided to rely on each other’s good faith for performance, plaintiff’s counsel should ensure that the period for payment is clearly specified. ___ 5. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:20 pm
Here are a few recent cases currently featured on the blog (and cites to all these cases are there, too): In re Flores, from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:00 pm
Today's blog entry re-prints my September 11, 2008 entry. [read post]
