Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 9,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
RIME is a well known street artist who has been resident in Brooklyn. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
The judges took turns testing this theory, Judge Kavanaugh by noting the Supreme Court’s seemingly equation, in Justice Kennedy’s Hamdan I concurrence and other places, of the law of war with international law; Judge Janice Rogers Brown, by asking whether the government meant to rest on a purely “domestic common law of war” theory, or the theory that U.S. practice serves to delimit inexact boundaries in international law; and Judge David Tatel, by wondering what… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Stanley, Barber, Southard, Brown & Associates (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 518, or (ii) the judge’s personal knowledge of the facts of the case. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
I am satisfied that he took into account relevant matters, did not misunderstand the facts, and certainly understood the law. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Brown, No. 10-76, slip op. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
§ 362(h), leaving this matter to the exclusive province of the debtor in most cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
Brown (Sept. 26, 1991), Mahoning App. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(PatLit) Taking control of outside legal spending (inovia) Global – Copyright USTR releases finalized ACTA (Public Knowledge) (IP Watch) (Techdirt) (Patently-O) (ipwars) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (Knowledge Ecology International) (Spicy IP) ACTA: USTR’s talking points to WTO Council for TRIPS (Knowledge Ecology International) A KEI note to Library of Congress about ACTA text (Knowledge Ecology International) Non-responsive letter from David Kappos of USPTO to Senators Sanders and… [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
“In order to have a valid judgment the court must have both jurisdiction over the subject matter of the litigation and jurisdiction over the parties. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
The systematic unanimity of the Supreme Court following Brown seems to have had no affect, for example, on segregationist willingness to accept even the smidgen of desegregation (one cannot possibly call it "integration") in, say, Little Rock. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:44 am
Not that it wasn't happening, but that it didn't matter. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 11:53 am
Perhaps there is something in the American culture that accepts Lucy enticing Charlie Brown and then snatching the football from him. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
But context and language matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Brown (which I discussed in the preceding post). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
While that technically is true, it ultimately does not matter. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am
But that’s partly why this all matters, and should be gotten right. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
Brown (1961), Newman v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:57 am
Brown, 558 NE 2d 309 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1990 Some level of opinion testimony is permitted under the Illinois Rules of Evidence. [read post]
