Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 7,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2022, 7:37 pm
Cf Bruce MacEwen, “Introducing the Maroons & the Grays: Part 1,” Adam Smith Esq., June 3, 2019 (making a similar market-segmentation point). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:51 am
” To what entities does the new standard apply? [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
This grass-roots initiative adopted a three-prong approach focusing on: 1) code updates, 2) internationalization and 3) intellectual property issues. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
I have been General Counsel of the Department of Defense now for exactly 3 years and 12 days, having been appointed to that position by President Obama on February 10, 2009. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
2007 Both Houses Bills, With a 8-Day Date Range , Word Search: correction adj3 law Sorted by Last Action Date
Search Results Count = 30
Run Date: 04/23/07 08:23 AM
Last Action Date: 04/16/07(Results Count = 2)
Bill No. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
Perfect is the enemy of the good [this echoes through Twitter] [why does JZ get what many librarians don’t?] [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:12 am
Thus, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress […] (Emphasis added.) [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
John's University School of Law and New York Law School, commented: "... [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
– visual artists will eventually receive small share of resale value of their artworks (1709 Copyright Blog) Canada Patents update – new Practice Notice on Obviousness 2 Nov 2009 – introduces four part test on obviousness following Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo (ipblog.ca) Court injects ‘duty of candour’ requirements for patent agents: Lundbeck Canada v Ratiopharm (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings) Vancouver Olympic Committee unravels Cowichan sweater trade mark… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:08 am
Andrew Peck) Blogging, Friending and Tweeting: What Lawyers Should and Should Not Do - http://tinyurl.com/3lrzmna (Chris Dale) Brag Busters: Discipline Is on the Way for Social Media Malefactors, Panel Says - http://tinyurl.com/4xmve8j (Joe Dysart) Communication With Counsel Not Always Private - http://tinyurl.com/3zyeo9t (Fred Blum, Antonio Garcia) Court in California Bounces Copyright Suit Over 26-Word Listserv Post - http://bit.ly/hGA4EF (Eric Johnson) Deal Reached on Access to Toyota's… [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
” Slip op. at 2. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
No. 93-854, 1 (May 16, 1974) (report accompanying S. 2543) (Comm. on the Judiciary).[2] This is, of course, typified by Justice Brandeis’ famous aphorism describing sunlight as the best disinfectant.[3] See, e.g., Brigham Daniels, Mark Buntaine, Tanner Bangerter, Testing Transparency, 114 NW. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The appellate court's opinion, written by Associate Justice John M. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
"The power to tax involves the power to destroy," Chief Justice John Marshall wrote. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:12 am
CR RDB-19-0438, 2020 WL 6485087, at *2–3 (D. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
”(2) Critics of Justice Roberts’ reasoning accuse him of being activist [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
He boosted lobbying efforts, increasing NFL expenditures to more than $1 million that year for the first time. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
John Dingell Jr. had a plan. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 pm
” … [T]he First Amendment constitutionally bars the government from criminally punishing 1) true speech about the conduct of public officials, regardless of the intent motivating the speech, and 2) false statements about the conduct of public officials unless knowingly false or made with reckless disregard of their falsity (i.e., unless made with actual malice). [read post]
