Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 19,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm
The former are already doing better than the latter by reason of having succeeded in the mutual job quest, then they're further rewarded by the EITC, while the latter get nothing.The reasons for nonetheless possibly favoring a wage subsidy via the EITC include:(a) claims about positive externalities, if working today increases the likelihood of working in the future & this benefits others, such as one's children or for that matter other taxpayers,(b) parallel claims… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:42 am
There aren’t any nominees for the two open seats. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
This isn't great. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
This isn't great. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:01 am
Sometimes, even when it make sense, things don’t work out well. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 2:34 am
She was also indicted on a state-jail felony count alleging tampering with a government record and a Class B misdemeanor charge. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 2:34 am
She was also indicted on a state-jail felony count alleging tampering with a government record and a Class B misdemeanor charge. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:06 pm
Specifically, imagine a transaction in which funds are moving from A to D, but go through intermediary financial institutions B and C: A-->B-->C-->D. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:09 pm
In this case, there apparently was no written request by DOE that the GAO decide this matter. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am
Aren’t they better suited to address this, and isn’t there a bill pending? [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:14 am
Therefore, it is important to know as a threshold matter: a) when someone is a candidate and b) when they are considered to have made a “use” of a station. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:50 am
Don’t make another one by hiring the wrong attorney. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
(b) Moreover, it is noted that the examining division in the impugned decision contented itself with reproducing the appellant's submission and subsequently with stating that the relevant feature could not be unambiguously derived from the description as originally filed. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
A v B & Anor, heard 12 Dec 2017. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
There’s nothing you can’t research in a matter of a couple of minutes and find out about someone. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 1:43 pm
Not matter of substantive failure to follow legal obligations. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:02 am
"Let's be clear: A) This was happening for DECADES before Black Lives Matter was on the scene, and B) the county NOT letting defendants be advised by lawyers at bail hearings was a big part of the suit! [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
I am delighted to set out below some thoughts on a recently published book on corporate social responsibility (CSR). [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:20 pm
In the matter styled: In re Examworks Group, Inc. [read post]
