Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 6761 - 6780 of 18,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
Wohlman, 578 P. 2d 530 (Wash: Court of Appeals, 1st Div. 1978), where “[b]etween Christmas 1975 and New Year’s Day 1976, the defendants decided to leave the employment of A&A. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Wohlman, 578 P. 2d 530 (Wash: Court of Appeals, 1st Div. 1978), where “[b]etween Christmas 1975 and New Year’s Day 1976, the defendants decided to leave the employment of A&A. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 12:17 am by Dieneke de Vos
” Or in relation to witness P-0235 (one of Ongwen’s forced wives): “He raped her three times. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:16 am by Charles Sartain
Neither party agreed with the auditor’s report and the matter was arbitrated. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
 Here's the summary of how the matter ended up before the Court of Appeal:Appellants Nivida Lubin, Sylvia M. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 5:21 pm by Bill Otis
"  He pointed out that "as much as" fifty percent off could mean as little as five percent off  -- or zero percent off for that matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Noting that “[p]roject applicants are encouraged to develop comprehensive transportation management plans” (citing City of Hayward v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
P. 12 (describing the procedure for entering a guilty plea) that was in effect at the time of the defendant’s plea did not require that the judge “include any warnings about sex offender registration”; and (3) at the time of the defendant’s plea, the “tender of plea” form used in the District Court “contained a warning about deportation but not about sex offender registration. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
P. 12 (describing the procedure for entering a guilty plea) that was in effect at the time of the defendant’s plea did not require that the judge “include any warnings about sex offender registration”; and (3) at the time of the defendant’s plea, the “tender of plea” form used in the District Court “contained a warning about deportation but not about sex offender registration. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:41 am by Andrew Delaney
Levitt’s next argument is that because the court just said “Conditions A through N, and also P,” he never knew what was happening. [read post]