Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 6761 - 6780
of 120,415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2023, 2:49 am
The Judge decided to adopt the same approach as in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 711 (Pat) and in the US judgment TCL v Ericsson (C.D. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
I would like to use this post to suggest a different law and economics legacy to which it may be useful to compare and contrast Guido, with the hope of shedding further light on his scholarship and the history of law and economics in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
She said that the proposed rule is susceptible to legal challenges on various grounds, including that (1) the FTC may lack authority to engage in this type of substantive competition rulemaking based on the history of the FTC Act, (2) the rule is potentially barred under the “major questions doctrine” as recently addressed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
Sanofi, the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for patenting, and ethics pitfalls practitioners may face as a result of AI use. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
Sanofi, the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for patenting, and ethics pitfalls practitioners may face as a result of AI use. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
From Lee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:31 pm
On May 25, 2023, the Second Circuit issued an opinion in Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
” Saenz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:52 pm
After states started passing legislation legalizing NIL opportunities for college athletes and getting lambasted in NCAA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
CNN quotes Wildermuth: "'Are we using the right terms? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:14 am
Yesterday the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Sanders v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:44 am
Sys. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
It definitely wasn't the answer the European Court of Justice gave in 2015 when it decided the preliminary reference in Huawei v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:00 am
As the Second Circuit explained in Saleem v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Furthermore, Trump is both trying to use the PRA as a shield and essentially claiming to have violated it. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
A taking from another author’s work for the purpose of making points that have no bearing on the original may well be fair use, but the taker would need to show a justification.3Authors Guild v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
So although VIP’s effort to ridicule Jack Daniel’s does not justify use of the Rogers test, it may make a difference in the standard trademark analysis. [read post]
