Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 10,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2016, 6:02 am
Mazur admits that license has been taken in the film because the subject matter, while thrilling, isn’t as sexy as it happens. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
The use of force is a matter that is either permitted by law or not. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:46 am
Mauled Again Maule is obviously to the left of the political spectrum when it comes to fiscal matters and, to his credit, he doesn’t try to camoflauge it. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
Could Chief Justice John Roberts be able to work similar magic in the absence of Justice Stevens? [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:50 pm
No matter what a Grand Jury decides, an accused has a right to testify in his or her own defense. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 2:16 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts, however, appeared skeptical. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am
Actually, it doesn’t matter what you or Ruminations think, because (in the first scenario), a U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:43 pm
They just didn’t agree to work together toward that goal together. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
Epstein couldn’t seek to undo the NPA because he lacks standing to do so. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Oral Argument Chief Judge Robert Katzmann and Judges Christopher Droney and Richard Sullivan heard the case. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See for example, George Clooney’s and Julia Roberts’ legal travails. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Report of the Council to the membership of the American Law Institute on the matter of the death penalty (April 15, 2009). [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
But three other relevant factors favored EOIR and carried the day a matter of law. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 2:32 am
I mention all of this to illustrate two points: First, when the subject-matter of the judge-shopping wasn't ideologically charged, folks didn't seem to have trouble separating out the Waco docket's terrible optics for public confidence in the federal courts, on the one hand, from the perfectly ethical behavior of the lawyers who filed their cases in Waco and the judge who made it known that he was receptive to them, on the other. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
" Exactly where this will lead the legal profession, and when and how, is still a matter of some debate. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 3:29 pm
One can agree or disagree with her decision, but if one is simply trying to explain it, I don't think it suffices simply to look at the existing legal doctrine, since, obviously, it doesn't speak in one conclusive voice. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
I don’t care which political party you support, this is an affront to the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:42 am
Busk’s counterargument in his brief, noting that the security checks are mandatory, is fairly straightforward: “If the company tells you to do it, it doesn’t matter whether it’s related to what else you do on the job. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
It was, but don’t get too carried away here. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:14 am
None of this may matter to a New York jury. [read post]
