Search for: "People v. Downs"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 16,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2013, 2:13 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Resources Legal Cases Riley v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
The People) (ArsTechnica) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Blog) (Out-Law.com) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Minnesota: Judge again reduces award to $2250 per infringed work in Capitol Records v Thomas-Rasset – RIAA appeals (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:54 pm
Putting aside the narrowly religious arguments, which even most religious people recognize are an inappropriate basis for law in our nation, what it really comes down to is this: Some people fear that for our government legally to recognize Mollie and Andrea's bond to one another would undermine the integrity of marriage as an institution. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:54 pm
Putting aside the narrowly religious arguments, which even most religious people recognize are an inappropriate basis for law in our nation, what it really comes down to is this: Some people fear that for our government legally to recognize Mollie and Andrea's bond to one another would undermine the integrity of marriage as an institution. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
(A crowdfunded IPR process is how we shut down the dangerous “podcasting” patent.) [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:21 am
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Giglio v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:58 am
His latest one, Espenscheid v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:56 am
Case in point, a single Nokia v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:46 am
<> City of Pomona v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
[v]Some don’t consider this the fail-safe that the government is touting it to be. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:40 am
From New York Times Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:00 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 5:14 am
US (not yet) US. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:41 am
Samsung at this stage) hear about such rulings, bad news for Apple's European patents may also, not as the most important factor but as another piece of the puzzle, dissuade American jurists from buying Apple's innovator v. copycat story. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:19 pm
(See People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
We have a list of people who have attended the previous event, back in 2012, but it's now somewhat out-of-date: promotions, career moves and maternity leave being the main culprits. [read post]
