Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 14,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
As I noted in an earlier post, in the 1979 Smith v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:11 am
Miss Berrisford would appear to have no hope, and that was the view taken by Peter Smith J who granted summary judgment. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:29 pm
Smith, 2007 Wash. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:12 pm
Hill & Smith [1982] RPC 183; Improver Corporation v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. (1) Sufficient evidence supported dogfighting convictions; (2) Leading question during State’s direct examination was not error; (3) The trial court did not err by ordering restitution for all the seized animals or by failing to explicitly consider the defendant’s ability to pay, but erred in converting the restitution award to a civil judgment absent statutory authorization State v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:12 am
Smith (Jury Selection)Gilliam v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
Dretke & Smith v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged in March about the court’s rejecting the religious accommodation claim in this case, but the court (in Jama v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm
Concepcion, and, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1062 (6th Cir. 1998), we affirm. 07a0438p.06 Smith, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
Yet one of them, John Smith, is a citizen of New Zealand. . . . [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
(See Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
In such situations, the prosecutor may be relying on evidence that exists in the case, but characterizes it differently depending on what suits the prosecutor’s theory, even if the arguments made in both cases are mutually inconsistent (see, e.g., Smith v Groose, 205 F3d 1045, 1050 [8th Cir 2000]; Thompson v Calderon, 120 F3d 1045 [9th Cir 1997], rev’d on other grounds 523 US 538; United States v Salerno, 937 F2d 797, 812 [2nd Cir 1991],… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Contrary to Devereaux’s contention, the allegedly defamatory statement made by Burrows was not actionable because it was absolutely privileged as a matter of law (see Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d 951, 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734; Bisogno v Borsa, 101 AD3d 780, 781; Kilkenny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP, 76 AD3d 512, 513), and does not support a finding of a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Seldon v Lewis… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:08 am
[A thoughtful, sober take on Trump v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:31 am
Co. v Smith, 277 AD2d 390 [2000]). [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:35 am
Today's opinion in Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
Perry, 301 S.C. 147, 390 S.E.2d 480, 481 (Ct.App. 1990) (rejecting wife’s claim that her “adultery is not supported by the preponderance of the evidence”); Smith v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
Grungo-Smith v. [read post]
