Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 6761 - 6780 of 12,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2013, 3:25 pm
  And, I might add, worth filing.Because two dollars a page to copy a transcript that's alerady been created (and paid for) is absurd. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:17 pm
”“My assumption is that it’s speaking to the Timminco case,” says Jeremy Devereux, a partner with Norton Rose Canada LLP, referring to Sharma v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:33 am by Josh Bell
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Google and, before Google acquired it, Motorola never really liked the Microsoft v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” But if the gov’t said not to link to those pages Google would say “that’s our speech. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:50 am
 However, there's plenty of interesting material in the 17-page decision for the trade mark connoisseur to ponder. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:24 pm by Terry Hart
Indeed, there is much to agree with in the 102 page report. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
You can, if you're inclined, read the 18 page Sentencing Order here. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
The judge then explains that by[u]sing this software, the government seeks to obtain the following information:(1) records existing on the Target Computer at the time the software is installed, including:• records of Internet Protocol addresses used; records of Internet activity, including firewall logs, caches, browser history and cookies, “bookmarked” or “favorite” Web pages, search terms that the user entered into any Internet search engine, and records of… [read post]