Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 6761 - 6780 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Its “prime directive” states: “an organization shall always be prepared to produce its records as evidence,” (clause 5.4.3(c), p. 17). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  In other cases, the damage/ distress caused by an unauthorised disclosure may be much more limited (e.g. where a clinic mistakenly sends notes regarding Patient Bs vasectomy operation to Patient C). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Sections III and IV explore the power of ideology in framing analysis in Gunther Teubner’s conception of the reality of self-constitutionalizing organization outside the state and in Peer Zumbansen’s theorizing of transnational law as method. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:26 am by Sean Hanover
(v) The country that had sovereignty over the alien’s birthplace when the alien was born. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 5:46 am by Mark S. Humphreys
"Insured person" means: a. you or a relative; b. any person while operating a covered auto with the permission of you or a relative; c. any person occupying, but not operating, a covered auto; and d. any person who is entitled to recover damages covered by this Part III(B) [UIM coverage] because of bodily injury sustained by a person described in a, b, or c above. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
 . and institute predictive coding at that earlier stage sits uneasily with the proportionality standard in Rule 26(b)(2)(C). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 2:00 am by John Mastoras
  These cases established three factors to determine whether the courts have jurisdiction to entertain a dispute between an employee and his or her employer in the face of a collective agreement: a) the “ambit” of that collective agreement; b) the essential character of the dispute between the parties; and c) whether the collective agreement provides the employee or the employer with an effective remedy. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:30 pm
Code § 3553(c), a sentencing court must state `the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Aaron Rubin and Leanne Ta
Therefore, the court went on to consider whether Darnaa’s allegations were sufficient to state a claim. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Aaron Rubin and Leanne Ta
Therefore, the court went on to consider whether Darnaa’s allegations were sufficient to state a claim. [read post]