Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
Now along comes the Court's decision in the school-search case, Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 8:42 pm
The question in R v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:54 pm
The Matter of Padulo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
But just as a State may not deny rights protected under the Federal Constitution through pretextual procedural rulings, see NAACP v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
In any event, the practice in many States already accords with today's decision, and the serious disruption predicted by respondent and the dissent has not materialized.The other case is Safford United School District # 1 v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 1:14 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:54 am
" For more information, see the West Virginia case of Caperton et. al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 3:58 pm
Lameman (discussed here and here) stated as follows:The summary judgment rule serves an important purpose in the civil litigation system. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:10 am
Leathermon v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:28 am
See Timpte Industries Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
8Circuit.png In trial for the production, distribution and possession of child pornography, affirming exclusion of defense expert testimony that the defendant "was not a pedophile and was not sexually attracted to young girls" to explain his "motive for taking the photographs" as irrelevant to the issue of the "sexual character" of the images, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:04 pm
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:13 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
Pickering v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
As regards the strength of the reputation and the degree of distinctive character of the mark, the Court has already held that, the stronger that mark's distinctive character and reputation are, the easier it will be to accept that detriment has been caused to it. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
