Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 12:54 pm
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:54 pm
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 7:55 am
The style of the case is, Canal Indemnity Company v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
West, Member of Congress and Lieutenant Colonel, United States Army (Ret.), in Support of Petitioner Brief for Judicial Watch, Inc., and Allied Educational Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Louis D. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
What Not to Wear: Clothing Rationing During World War II Alchemy and The Act Against Multipliers New Law Library of Congress Report Examines Pharmaceutical Antitrust Cases Hansberry v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
United States (1928) and Goldman v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
Last week, in Rosario v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
In the 2011 case of Doomes v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:56 am
The argument of the bondholder in Perry v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 5:50 am
And since state courts are authorized to decide issues of federal law unless Congress decrees otherwise, confining a class of federal-law cases to state courts does not deprive litigants of their federal rights. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
United States . . . [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 8:22 am
Arising out of the Ninth Circuit, Ross asks a question central to our constitutional system: Leveraging its immense market power, may a single state (California) usurp Congress’s authority over interstate commerce by enacting a regulation that forces the restructuring of an entire U.S. industry, in this case the national pork products industry? [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:08 am
Here is the opinion in Hamaatsa Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
Additionally, the Court explained that Congress needs to use a clear statement to intrude onto a longstanding attribute of state law: landlord-tenant relationships. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:47 pm
CAAF's new opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
The Fourth Circuit noted that under the traditional jurisprudence as stated in Marshall v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
: implied preemption of state-claims by the federal food and drug law Aetna Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
