Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 6761 - 6780
of 6,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2006, 9:31 am
Wells v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Randall McKinney v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
Click here to view both marks.On Thursday 14 December the Advocate General gives his Opinion in Case C-273/05 P Celltech R&D Ltd v OHIM. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Law Judge Raymond P. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:40 am
Joyce B. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 1:29 am
An Advocate General's Opinion from the European Court of Justice on which the IPKat has so far failed to comment was given on 26 October in Case C-412/05 P Alcon Inc v OHIM, Biofarma SA.In 1998 Alcon Inc applied to register the word TRAVATAN as a Community trade mark for phthalmic pharmaceutical preparations. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 8:11 pm
P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the copyright infringement claim filed agasint him, contending that the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 12:15 am
The article is published in Germany's leading historical journal, Historische Zeitschrift, vol. 281, p. 659 (2005). [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
§ 800.3(b). [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
The solution was suggested to me by the State's brief and its reliance on Slack v. [read post]
16 Sep 2006, 4:39 pm
Civil No. 05-42-B-W UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE 421 F. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 2:17 pm
On June 12, 1997 the enterprise changed its legal status and became a State Joint Stock Company keeping the same title. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 9:30 pm
P'ship, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
(Merck KGaA v. [read post]
12 Aug 2006, 7:14 am
(b) Exempt information. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 6:05 am
Para él, la punición penal no lo es...El aborto que se permite: regulaciones "tipo 3" .En Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
It is relatively simple to state that there must be an acceptable relation between the legitimate destructive effect and undesirable collateral effects. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 7:59 am
R (Boughton and Ors) v. [read post]
14 Jun 2006, 6:53 am
State v. [read post]
