Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 6761 - 6780 of 7,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Mukasey, No. 05-4448 Petition for review of a decision denying petitioner asylum and related relief, and finding that he was removable due to a prior state conviction for possession of a controlled substance, is denied where a remand was unnecessary because petitioner's challenge to the state court conviction constituted an impermissible collateral attack, and he presented no other claims that would entitle him to relief. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
"[1] It is this distinction which also divides the opinions of Stephen Bainbridge, Margaret Blair and Lynn Stout on one side from those of Lucian Bebchuk. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
Scientific-Atlanta (Stephen Bainbridge-UCLA Law School), and Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:35 am
., Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., and Jeffrey M. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:04 am
In the Louisiana case of Harrell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
  The result in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:38 pm
  Part of that would be due to the fact that Virginia’s lawyer, Deputy State Solicitor General Stephen B. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
But in the meantime, I thought our readers would be interested in another context in which DOJ interpretations have occasioned recent controversy: the current Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court, D.C. v. [read post]