Search for: "U.S. v. Mark*"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 24,241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 1:06 pm
" Gall, 552 U.S. at 50; United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
United States, 508 U.S. 36, 38 (1993)). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
(Curry v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:17 pm
As a result, the President has ordered the Treasury Secretary to conduct a review of the OLA and within 180 days, submit a report (with any recommendations for improvement) that reviews (i) the potential adverse effects of failing financial companies on U.S. financial stability, (ii) whether using the OLA would be consistent with the President’s recent “Core Principles” Executive Order on regulating the U.S. financial system; (iii) whether using the OLA would… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:13 am
Jesta Fontainebleau v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:20 am
Ford v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:31 pm
In a July 8, 2020 press release, the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
The U.S. action was filed in 2007. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Shelton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court in HHS v Florida, employers should be educating themselves on the new ACA requirements and planning for necessary changes to health plan documents. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (full decision here) in Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:02 pm
In Ocmulgee Fields Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:43 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (full decision here) in Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 11:03 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:40 am
This month the U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:50 am
U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964)). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
Medical directors at medical spas should be concerned that, unless the arrangement is carefully structured with an eye to legal rules and anti-kickback risks, regulatory enforcement authorities might perceive their role as sham and fraudulent.In U.S. v. [read post]
