Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 8,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
And, in Locke v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his earsThis case, the… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:31 pm
The case is Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
” Gordon College seeks review, arguing that all of its professors are Christian educators who are used to promote the Christian mission through teaching, scholarship, and service. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
In Rost v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
Smith (1879), 11 Ch. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Patent and Trademark Office under a 2011 federal statute, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
English cases in this category included: Smith v ADFVN ([2008] EWHC 1797 (QB)); Clift v Clarke [2011] EWHC 1164 (QB); and El Diwany v Hansen and Others ([2011] EWHC 2077 (QB)) . [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Thompson and Smith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
This is the same argument being used in pre-Gant cases today. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1983 for failing to prevent another officer’s use of force when that force was used within a short period such that a reasonable officer in the same circumstance would not have had a realistic opportunity to intervene; (2) whether the commands “get on the ground, drop the gun” are sufficient to satisfy the warning required prior to the use of deadly force; and (3) whether a party’s self-serving testimony that contradicts his or her prior… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
Smith, 18 AD3d 602; Lavin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Smith & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Crim 1772 (19 July 2011): Court of Appeal: Blanket internet bans for Sexual Offences Prevention Orders always disproportionate; court gives general guidance. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
” Slip op. 2 (ordinarily we’d use the Westlaw pagination, but for some bizarre reason WL doesn’t provide any for Arkansas slips). [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
” There was a post about the case on the Inforrm Blog by Hugh Tomlinson QC “Case Law: R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, Police use of “automatic facial recognition technology unlawful”. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
[See, See R. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
