Search for: "White v. United States"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 7,208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Think about it this way: minority voters in a city may be 40 percent of the voters in a particular city in Alabama, 25 percent of the voters in the state as a whole, and 12 percent of the voters in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:36 am
Last month, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, in EEOC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:56 am
A case yesterday decided by the United States District Court of Connecticut highlights that distinction.In Charles v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:08 pm
In a second cse, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
Supreme Court held in Illinois Brick v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 7:25 am
Many conservatives believe the Rehnquist Court correctly interpreted the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2008, 2:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
Section 1981, passed during Reconstruction, provides that “[a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right to make and enforce contracts … as enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
COMPLEX TECH: If your firm doesn't understand technology, digital redaction disasters are inevitable
28 May 2008, 1:30 pm
For example, General Order 08-02, issued by the United States District Court, Central District of California, requires redaction to protect "sensitive and private information. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:51 pm
" This was therefore not a case like United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:37 am
To allow a defendant an opportunity to try his or her case civilly first would allow the defendant to get to see the government's evidence and witnesses while the stakes are lower.The decision in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:01 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:32 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule in the Quill v. [read post]
