Search for: "*u. S. v. Price" Results 661 - 680 of 873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2014, 5:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Stocks, stock rights, and bonds that hit rock bottom and are completely worthless during the tax year are treated as though they were sold – at a zero price – on the last day of the tax year. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has an interesting post on “medical privacy” dealing with the case of ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2017) EWCA Civ 336 which concludes that clinicians treating a patient with Huntingdon’s disease have an arguable duty to disclose the diagnosis to the patient’s daughters. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Not according to a recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in Balkind v Nickel, 2018 NY Slip Op 31703(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 16, 2018], in which she dismissed a deadlock dissolution petition filed under Section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law brought by a 49% shareholder, despite his co-equal board and shareholder control. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ferenets v Kenworthy  2019 NY Slip Op 33751(U) November 22, 2019 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 712299/2019 Judge: Cheree A. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am by Peter Mahler
The case and Justice Knipel’s decision in Celauro v 4C Foods Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 31917(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Oct. 12, 2016], is the latest in a series of litigations and court rulings between two factions of the Celauro family beginning around 2005, following the death of Nathan’s father the year before. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:07 pm by Ronald A. Cass
The Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Auer v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:51 am by admin
The story highlights the fact that advertising restraints (like other types of competition restraints, such as relating to price, output, etc.) can be insulated from competition challenges when they are lodged in valid provincial or federal legislation (based on Canada’s “regulated conduct doctrine”). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:54 am by Florian Mueller
ZTE [...].a) The Chamber [= panel] outlined its interpretation of the CJEU opinion in Huawei v. [read post]