Search for: "32 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS" Results 661 - 680 of 839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 1:09 pm by Jayne Navarre
The survey’s executive summary states that of the 86 percent of the in-house counsel bar that use it at all, 68 percent use it to listen exclusively, while just 32 percent say they both listen and engage with others. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The FT has a report here and a story by PA Media Lawyer is available here. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
 In 2011, the Index report was downloaded 487,000 times and referenced in 320 major media articles and 4 State of the State addresses. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:36 pm by My name
This is supported by the fact that the 32 sponsors of SOPA received four times as much in contributions from the entertainment industry than Internet companies. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:05 am by cen
That gives these organs unlimited access to personal data which causes reasonable concerns. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
Adolf Coors Co., 157 F.3d 686, 694 n.4 (9th Cir. 1998) (citing Gertz for the proposition that a “private person who is allegedly defamed” must show “that the defamation was due to the negligence of the defendant,” in a case where the defendant was not a media organization). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:35 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
A minute for a word on PFC Bradley Manning’s confinement and Art. 32 hearing–because I now have the keyboard. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:05 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Since my fellow contributors have given the PFC Manning Art. 32 hearing short shrift, I’ll add this synopsis as the defense begins its case today. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:39 pm by Kim Zetter
This included various memory cards, a hard disk, and optical media disks. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:57 pm by Michael Geist
  It has also been outspoken on copyright reform, providing a submission to the C-32 legislative committee that stated the following on digital locks: The addition of one simple principle to C-32 would make the bill acceptable: That the circumvention of Technical Protection Measures be permitted for non-infringing uses. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:52 pm by Michael Geist
  The organization appeared before the Bill C-32 committee and stated the following on digital locks: It is important to underline that fair dealing and other educational gains are undermined with absolute digital lock protections. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:39 pm by Michael Geist
  The WGC's position paper on Bill C-32 included the following comments on digital locks: The only option that Bill C-32 offers creators is digital locks, which freezes current revenue streams for creators, and creates an illogical loophole in the copyright Bill by taking away the very rights the Bill grants to consumers in its other sections. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:26 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Dr Corrêa’s delegation included Jorge Barbosa Pontes, Federal Police Commissioner, Embassy of Brazil in Paris and former INTERPOL Executive Committee Member, and Flavia Diniz, Chief of Media Relations, Rio 2016 Organizing Committee. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:27 am by Kim Zetter
“There will be a lot of motions in between [the Article 32 hearing and the court martial],” Paterson said. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:10 pm by Michael Geist
On the issue of Bill C-32 and digital locks, the CAUT states: The current proposed prohibition on the circumvention of technological measures and the devices that facilitate that purpose render meaningless not only the rights of the education community but of the rights of access enjoyed by Canadians at large. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:38 pm by Michael Geist
" CIPPIC's comments on the digital lock rules on Bill C-32 included: Unfortunately, the bill also succumbs to U.S. pressure and makes fair dealing -- including the new exceptions for the many ordinary activities of Canadians -- illegal whenever there is a "digital lock" on a work. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:22 pm by Michael Geist
CASA's comments to the Bill C-32 committee included the following on digital locks: as is currently drafted, the educational fair dealing right is not enshrined as a true right, but a secondary right that can be overridden by a digital lock. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:17 am by Lovechilde
"  As of this writing "there were no reports of injuries or skirmishes and 32 were arrested for failing to disperse. [read post]