Search for: "A. J. Industries, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office) Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP) Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46) South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
What United States Supreme Court decisions actually get the most action in legal circles? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(The IP Factor) AIPI endorses Israel Commissioner of Patents for further term of office (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office rules judicial estoppels to prevent post decision amendment (The IP Factor) Nigeria Nigerian Copyright Commission to stay under Ministry of Justice (Afro-IP) Serbia Serbia IPO invalidates BULLDOG ENERGY DRINK recognising RED BULL as famous mark (The IP Factor) South Africa Advertising Standards Authority denies iBurst protection for colour… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(The IP Factor) AIPI endorses Israel Commissioner of Patents for further term of office (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office rules judicial estoppels to prevent post decision amendment (The IP Factor) Nigeria Nigerian Copyright Commission to stay under Ministry of Justice (Afro-IP) Serbia Serbia IPO invalidates BULLDOG ENERGY DRINK recognising RED BULL as famous mark (The IP Factor) South Africa Advertising Standards Authority denies iBurst protection for colour… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
: Federal Administrative Court rulings in CALVI and TRELLEBORG cases (International Law Office) Motion marks: Swiss IPO allows Swisscom to file MPG-file of motion mark in motion (Class 46) United Kingdom Class dispute over similarity of goods too complex for summary judgment: Daimler AG v Sany Group Co Ltd (Class 46) The war on counterfeits: how much would you spend? [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and… [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
&& 27-35, on file in State v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione… [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear an appeal in Jones v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:08 pm
Food-related illness and death in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
By analogy this could include the pharmaceutical industry as well. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
United Dominion Industries, Inc., 473 F.3d 532, 538 (3d Cir. 2007).There's no comparative fault in strict liability that would reduce a verdict where the plaintiff did something stupid. [read post]
