Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm
[1992] 2 AC 386 and Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd. v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52 as both taking the view that the LPA 1925 “seemed to underwrite the established common law position”, rather than invalidating the previous common law position on ‘hybrid’ tenancies. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Sandvig v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:10 am
Following the death of Jose Fernandez, the baseball world was in a state of shock. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” Briefly: At ACS, Ajmel Quereshi discusses Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:32 am
” Citing Lord Reid in Burmah Oil Co (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75, the Court determined: “The prerogative is really a relic of a past age, not lost by disuse, but only available for a case not covered by statute. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am
” At ACS, Sasha Samberg-Champion discusses Fry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
In one case (United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 1:07 pm
Josh is currently involved in cases challenging voting restrictions in several states, including a case in Wisconsin, One Wisconsin Institute v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
… Impeachment is Trump-voters’ ace in the hole. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:19 am
Marlins ace Jose Fernandez killed in boating accident, September 25, 2016, By Tim Healey and Mike Clary, Sun Sentinel More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
This author was delighted to stumble upon the latest decision in the intriguing litigation between Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier when browsing through the recent list of Chancery decisions ([2016] EWHC 366 (Ch)). [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
CormackRelated StoriesMary Mack of ACEDS: eDiscovery TrendsYou Don’t Have to Move Your Data to Manage it Effectively: Information Governance TrendsFlorida Becomes First State to Require Technology CLE: eDiscovery Trends [read post]
