Search for: "ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Chemerinsky opina sobre consecuencias de nombramiento de Brett Kavanaugh al Tribunal Supremo federal
3 Sep 2018, 7:25 am
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
’” The Second Circuit Court of Appeals on August 20, 2018 reinforced this recognition by remanding a guilty plea conviction in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
United States instructive. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:32 am
In 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Navarette v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:55 am
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs – Veterans) United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs - Veterans) United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:56 am
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm
To read the Texas lawsuit, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
According to SCOTUS Watch, which “tracks the public statements made by United States senators about how they plan to vote,” 31 Republicans are “likely yes” and 16 (including McCain) are “definitely yes” on the confirmation. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
Money transmitter regulation in the U.S. is separate from federal money services business registration, and is governed on a state-by-state basis. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:24 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), which is codified at section 775.021(4)(a) of the Florida Statutes, requires that each charged offense include an element the other does not.FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ V. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 12:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:23 am
The issue seems destined for further appeal, and many believe the case will rise to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. [read post]
